| Paul
Anyone wanting to read the definitive history of
bootlegs should pick up the book 'The Great White Wonders' by Clinton Heylin (June
'94). It is quite fascinating. Here, as part of the Prologue of the book is the authors
take on the right vs. wrong arguments of bootlegging:
| Everyone's stories are different, yet the song
remains the same. The Great White Wonders is as much an excuse to collect all those tall
tales as an attempt to provide a layman's account of the contradictory constructs that
have been mounted to stamp out an industry that has proved to be remarkably resilient. Bootlegs are here to stay because the appeal of hearing
music that has not been authorized or sanitized by the artist is always an enduring
one.
The Great White Wonders is, above all, a
celebration. Despite many shoddy titles, shameful practices and cowboy practitioners - who
have been responsible for much that is bad & ugly - I believe bootlegs have been a
positive influence on the music. They have reminded fans that rock & roll is about
"the moment", that you might have to wade through static, crackles, bad nights
and worse tapes to find one clear moment, but no record company can capture each and every
one worth preserving; that the record companies cannot lock music up in neat little boxes
and say "This is what you may listen to".
Hopefully the bootleggers have also freed an awful
lot of music that the artists themselves might not have 'approved' for release. But then,
never trust the artist, trust the tale. |
dking
I agree with most of what you've brought up here, Paul.
I agree that bootlegs of live performances and rare material are justified (maybe not
legal, but justified).
Outright piracy of tracks that are EASY to find legally
(ie. the entire 2nd disc of EscapeCD's set and much of the first) is wrong.
Granted SFW, YKIAI, ISTSA, ALT, MB, and LLSUI are
relatively hard to find. I wouldn't chastise anyone for wanting an easier way to locate
these tracks. Nearly all of the rest are EASY (with a few exceptions).
To those who think otherwise, I challenge you to spend
a little time shopping on the Internet. I live in Utah, where there is definitely a dearth
of TBS material, and I have found nearly everything in my collection through the Internet.
What I'm basically saying is that if you've found your way to the LFW list, you can
probably find most TBS items with a little searching.
To those that chastise the auctioneers of TBS items,
let me remind you that these items are rare. And it's not like these prices are chosen
arbitrarily. After several people bid on an item, the highest bid wins. How can you
complain about that?
There is no comparison between charging $30 for a CD-R
copy of TBS b-sides and an auction price of $80 for a "Song For Whoever" CD
single. A bootlegger could make a 100,000 copies of their b-side compilation if they found
a market for them. There will NEVER be any more copies of the "Song For Whoever"
CD single, or any of the back catalog singles for that matter.
As I mentioned previously, I will, for anyone who
wants, make a CD of the non-album tracks from the first album as well as the live tracks
from the BBT and 36D CD singles for anyone who wants for $8 U.S. including shipping.
If you really must have these tracks, let's not
encourage EscapeCD's type of piracy. I'll get you the tracks for next to nothing, if you
really want them.
As for the other singles, I would be glad to help.
(editor's note: see Purchasing TBS)
JoelPY
Before I say something to get me flamed, let me caveat:
| I have loyally followed TBS since 1989-90 when
someone charged into my dorm room waving a copy of WtTBS, whereupon we obsessively played
"tracks 1 and 8" until we couldn't stand them anymore and started to
listen to the rest of the disc. I
saw them in concert Spring'90 (Chestnut Cabaret, Philly, PA for those who remember it),
I've waxed at length on the relative genius of Heato's lyrical talents on the floor of
hostels all across Europe, and proslytized TBS's merits as far away as Dubai and
Australia. (end of caveat) |
Basically, I'm bemused by a few things
about the current bootlegging debate:
a) Nobody raised any moral objections
before, when people we "know" were the bootleggers Maybe all of
these deep-seated feelings were present before (I'll give D.King points for consistency
and eloquence, since he's resisted my grovelling several times in the
past) It's only now that this EscapeCD thing has come along, someone who is
definitely a newcomer, and possibly a scam artist, that anyone on this list has voiced a
single moral objection to anything (editor's note: Jen tells me this isn't
true)
b) Doesn't anybody else feel like the band is working
us over in the pocket pretty badly with the whole paired CD single thing Not only
are THEY blatantly fleecing us for dough, it's so damned inconvenient to have two puny
three song discs rather than a couple fewer five song EPs. Shit, charge me the same
obscene price, I'll pay it, but I'm sick of having all of these stupid discs rolling
around. I'll buy every TBS item I can get my hands on, but I'd love the convenience
of actually having some decent bulk on any one of the discs
c) How much money can a "for profit"
bootlegger make selling a few copies of a CD-R from a marginally obscure band to an
email list of whose total population is only a couple of hundred souls anyway I
don't know much about the economics of CD-R (I understand prices have come down
substantially on blank media) but don't you think bootlegging the Stones or Jimmy Buffet
would be a better way to "make money"
d) Who is there on this list who would buy an expensive
bootleg who wouldn't also buy every LP the band itself puts out. I hardly think that
after 9.5 years of diligently buying every single import-priced TBS disc I could get my
hands on that I'm really going to hurt them in the pocket book now. (and I realize I spend
money more freely than some other members of LFW seem to, students, young parents, etc.)
e) Does anybody realize that bands make a pittance from
record sales anyway (granted that is less true after the third album or so, particularly a
group with a not-fickle following like TBS) virtually anything that happens to get people
to live shows will pay for TBS, whether or not all of the bootleggers go to hell.
It sure never hurt the Grateful Dead, and all of their
bootleggers certainly were not of the tape and SASE crowd.
dking
a) I don't think anyone here has a real objection to
pure bootlegging of live material as well as extremely rare tracks. The moral objection
only came up when it came to piracy of easy to find tracks. To my knowledge, this is the
first time that this has come up on the list. Much of this message assumes that
"bootlegging" and "piracy" are the same thing. As I've mentioned in
previous posts, I don't believe that they are. The moral objections only came up when
piracy was brought into the picture.
b) The band does not like doing these types of releases
(paired CD singles). They are pressured into them by their record label. On the other
hand, I feel that fans benefit by the double CD singles. If they were only going to
release one, there is no way that they would bother to come up with 4 bonus tracks. By
releasing two, we have the benefit of getting more TBS material.
I agree that having so many discs is inconvenient, but
does it justify pirating the tracks? I must admit that I've thrown several of the
tracks on to a single CD for my convenience, but not until tracking down all of the
singles. And what if they are fleecing us (I mean the record company)? They have a
right to. They own the material. If you owned something valuable, I'm sure that you would
be very unhappy if others were selling it for their own profit. Record companies are in
business to make money. Sure, they want you to buy two CD singles instead just one. But
this type of business practice is not limited to the record industry. Just because
something may be more expensive than we wish to pay does not justify theft.
d) I'm sure that there are many members of this list
that own few or noneof the CD singles. If someone in this situation is able to buy all of
the b-sides that ever existed instead of tracking down all of the singles, I think that
this would be very appealing. Now I agree with your statement in regards to live bootlegs.
It's unlikely that someone would buy a SWM or October until they owned all of the albums.
But a pirate b-side CD is not the same thing. In order to save several hundred dollars in
purchases, I'm sure that many people that do not own the material would love to get such a
CD. You seem to justify the theft by saying that the band is doing well
anyway, and to justify the idea that since you've bought a lot of other items from the
band that it's OK to steal the rest.
e) [Your] justification is that since the band doesn't
get much profit from their records sales, it is OK to steal it. It is also saying that
since the band makes so much from their live performances, it's alright to steal their
profits from their records sales. Theft is theft and I'm sure you wouldn't feel the same
if the roles were reversed.
We're not talking about live performances. I agree that
live bootlegs ultimately help a band. I'm sure you're not saying that pirated copies of
regular release items of the Grateful Dead helps that band.
JoelPY
Mostly I'm surprised by the amount of heat and light
this has generated from people who, unlike yourself, have never made a peep before. I've
been trying to decide how much is actually outrage, and how much parochialism based on the
fact that Escape isn't one of "us".
"Fans benefit by the double CD singles. If
they were only going to release one, there is no way that they would bother to come up
with 4 bonus tracks"
So, Paul ONLY makes up songs to fill up albums ? I
don't buy it. This makes even less sense since the incremental cost of studio time and
pressing is miniscule compared to all of the other expenses involved in distributing an
album.
"What if they are fleecing us (I mean the
record company)? They have a right to ..."
To quote Jen out of context:
"Bullshit." Obviously they have the RIGHT to, that certainly doesn't
justify it.
"Just because something may be more expensive
than we wish to pay does not justify theft"
Well, obviously you are correct here, although our
hair-splitting about booting versus piracy wouldn't make anyone at Sony Music or A&M
happy
(cf. Go! discs)
Many LFWers have expressed substantial financial
constraints before. That group was never going to purchase all, or even many of the
expensive CD singles I was bemoaning, particularly not both of a twofer.
This [bootlegging] falls into the "no blood no
foul" category.
"This justification is that since the band
doesn't get much profit from their records sales, it is OK to steal it"
What I was trying to highlight was that those bootlegs
that LFW seems to have sanctified, live concerts, in fact violate the one area where TBS
unambiguously makes a lot of money.
Kipjaz (Mr.
RTF)
When I first conceived RTF I thought of it
as bootleg socialism -- The Anti-Capitalism Boot, rather, it turned out that way. To date
I've made about $70-80 dollars with 110 copies of RTF being distributed.
If you calculate the hourly rate it's got to be
something pathetic. I spent ridiculous amounts of time on that thing.
But while this sounds all noble, in practice I found it
slightly frustrating. Because this sort of project is so time consuming, it becomes almost
charity work. Though I'm sure LFW is deserving, I can think of more needy charities!
So I have come to see the other side of charging a
modest fee for these ventures. The keyword is "modest". It was idiocy for me to
do RTF totally non-profit. In hindsight, I'd figure in a small profit - maybe a dollar or
two per disc.
So in theory EscapeCD making money on this CD doesn't
bother me too much. Personally, I think $16 for a CD-R is high - I'd like to know what
EscapeCD's profit margin is.
While I wish EscapeCD would distribute CDs for cost,
and I support the idea of staying away from easy-to-find material in a theoretical sense,
I like the idea of getting all of the B-sides in one place and probably will get these
discs.
Ultimately, I think there are few repercussions from
projects like RTF, SWM, and EscapeCD. In the grand scheme of things, we're talking
maybe hundreds of copies - surely not enough to noticeably affect anything, except the
wallet of whoever buys the thing.
dking
(To EscapeCD, in response to someone requesting a
pirated copy of
Briana Corrigan's disc)
Briana's album is still in print, but so is most of
your [EscapeCD] Disc 3. You can go to nearly any mail order company and order all of the
singles from "Blue Is The Colour" as well as Briana's singles.
Why does Briana's full length deserveany special
treatment? Why don't you start burning copies of those and charging $16 for them. While
you're at it, you could create a special 5 disc collection of the band's five albums.
You encourage your friend to buy an original copy of
"When Your Arms Wrap Me Round" while encouraging those on this list to buy your
pirated CD instead of "Rotterdam", "Don't Marry Her" (1&2),
"Blackbird On The Wire" (1&2),"Liars' Bar" (1&2), and Briana's
"Love Me Now" (1&2). Not to mention "DreamA Little Dream" and
"Pretenders To The Throne" which may not be in print butare very easy to find.
The only tracks which could legitimately be called
"hard to find" on disc three are the first two. You obviously don't have
any moral objections to what you're doing with the TBS and Briana singles that are in
print. Why stop there? It's a slippery slope when you say that it's OK to pirate the
band's most recent singles,but there is something wrong with pirating Briana's album. In
otherwords,it's all wrong!
There is no difference between pirating BITC and
pirating their current singles that are in print so don't kid yourself. I would be
perfectly satisfied if disc 3 just didn't exist. There is no reason for it and there is
certainly no reason for it on this list. I find it distasteful that someone who claims to
be one of our own would be OK with encouraging people NOT to buy the recent TBS singles
but rather buy their pirated version.
Well, enough of this tirade. I think my point has been
made.
EscapeCD
I must say I didn't read your whole post (yawn).
I think I got to the 2nd paragraph.
I' m not saying people should not buy the new singles
-- I would have bought them anyway, and I think most fans who buy Vol. 3 will also buy the
singles when and if they can find them, This list is for diehards, we collect everything.
Vol. 3 is great because it's a compilation of the
tracks, very convenient for listening to these great song's when they are all in one place
-- it's really the icing on the cake for Volumes 1 & 2.
Look we are not going to agree on this issue. I'm
not going to stop burning CD's for people.you're not going to move next door to me and
come over for pie. Get over it.
Michigan Joe
I for one would like to WHOLE-HEARTEDLY and SINCERELY
say how much I agree with David King's very carefully stated reply regarding selling discs
-FOR PROFIT - of material commercially, readily available. Yes it's convenient to have
b-sides collected in one place, butfor those without CD recorders, tapes work quite
nicely. That's not really the point, though.
If this was just about a convenience for fans, the
discs would be costing $5 or $6 instead of $16 (or ONLY $43 for all three!!!). That way if
the band wasn't getting any of the profits, at least some other soul who had nothing to do
with the creation ofthe material wouldn't be making a profit either.
L.Jack
I am the proud owner of all three cds. I didn't mind
paying the price Escape Music asked, and I was one of the lucky ones to be upgraded for
the original price. I have also since then bought 5 other CD singles when I had the
opportunity. I would recommend [Beautiful B's] to anyone interested in them, especially
someone like me who acquired most of what she owns through very over priced auctions out
of desperation. Every insult that gets thrown at Escape music is also thrown at
every person from the list who bought the CDs.
I am tired of being called a bad fan or someone who has
no place on this list because I chose to takeadvantage of this opportunity. Who's list is
it anyway?
Kipjaz
Look, the ultimate power in this case lies with the
consumer. If we (LFW) create a market for these types of pirated CDs - someone will show
up selling them. It's an age old system. But if we don't buy them, or make it unprofitable
to sell them, then we discourage this activity. Simple as that.
The joke is - we all want them, right? I mean, it's a
nice sounding collection. So not buying them is probably not realistic. But ... the
beauty is that anyone with a copy of this collection and a CD-R unit can instantly put
this Escape guy out of business. Bootlegging the bootleg is one of the great checkmates of
this game. So... anyone want to burn some copies of Vol. 1 & 2 for cheap or for
trade? Why not undercut Mr. Escape and burn cheap copies without the cheesy graphics --
that would be a real service to LFW!
Northern Dry Pundit
I once again noticed that the list has reared it's
unpleasant head and the same list members seem to be involved. List members discussing the
ethics of the Escape CD possibly would like to consider the following -- one list member
mentioned that maybe others should blow the Escape CD and sell it more cheaply. Well,
maybe the person who posted the comment to the list should remember that at least Mr.
Escape CD bothered to purchase each of the original version's of the tracks, with money
obviously going to the band in the first place.
The person wanting to re-boot the EscapeCD simply wants
the tracks, with not a penny going to the band...interesting.... now who is the villain:
Escape CD (who at least put some money into the pockets of the band, even if very little),
or the listmember who not only is prepared to rip the band off 100% but also rip off Mr.
Escape who spent time, money and his initiative compiling the CD.
L.Clarke
Yes, yes, its true . . . Maeve and I bow before LFW, we
have no morals or ethics, we'd rather rip off the villain by booting the boot. I'll bet
you've done nothing dishonest in your life. (I say as I take the halo from above your head
and polish it). You've never taped a film off of television?
Yes, its absolutely true that I just want the tracks.
Hell, I'm not even particular if it's on CD. I'd send a few blank tapes to someone on the
list with these CD's and ask them to tape them for me. (I'm sure everyone has done that at
least once in their lives). I just want to hear the music, and the songs for the sake of
hearing them. You must have missed the bit where I said that I would and do (albeit
somewhat slower than those of you with deep pockets) purchase the original CD as I can
afford/find them. I'll even send one dollar for each of these tapes to the band.
If you're going to take that holier than thou stance
then you should have upped the price for the Brighton CD and sent something to the band
for creating a market for it. Better still, go back to working for the band and then you
can do this legally -- rereleasing old, hard-to-find and live material.
Northern Dry Pundit
Well, actually, there you go typing before thinking, as
Laura and Alex will tell you Sean and Dave both know about the Brighton CD, think it was a
cool thing to do, and we actually left Sean a copy.
PTKOLB
A few weeks ago I had considerable comment on this
topic. My feelings have not changed. In response to Laura who stated that any slight to
EscapeCD is also directed at those who purchased the discs, I disagree. I do not blame you
for yielding to a tempting offer, do not intend to disparage you or your character, do not
hope you find yourself in federal court, nor do I look at you with contempt. I do hope you
whistle these tunes on your way to work and tell your friends and acquaintances what a
great band they are. You got the music you wanted and love and paid a pirate for it.
EscapeCD was originally offering a "favor" to
the LFW listers by compiling some rare, deleted, or largely difficult to find singles for
a relatively high price. The 3rd CD is the one that I took issue with as some of its
tracks are simply the LATEST releases and just an attempt to profit from the band.
EscapeCD's arrogance and disrespect for the law and the band is astounding. I
sarcastically offered to burn boots of BITC to save listers the trouble of having to
purchase it or the singles off of it (the convenience aspect). Maybe EscapeCD could
contract with the band to make these convenient, one-stop discs available as part of the
regular catalog! But then a real name would have to be used and there would be all those
messy legalities involved.
Granted, EscapeCD did obtain all of the singles and
money did make its way to the band (unless they were radio or retail promos) but we should
not be exalting EscapeCD. I stated that someone should pirate the pirate and if "it
was really the music that mattered" no one should take issue with it.
The pirate's pirate would be taking no more money away
from the band than EscapeCD is and is not reaping a profit from his exploitation of the
band's material. EscapeCD's "favor" or "service" was strictly an
attempt at profiteering. I have spent a considerable amount on the band's material,
merchandise, and also on a DAT and a burner, and could easily do a similar venture to
recoup some of my costs. I would argue that these are sunk costs as they would have been
incurred by me because I wanted the items for my own use and would have purchased them
regardless, just as EscapeCD did and should. To reward EscapeCD for originally buying
(possibly) the material is ridiculous. The price per disc- come off it, six bucks a disc
is reasonable, sixteen is a ripoff! So, buy them if you want (rebooting or transferring
them to tape would be great!) as each of can make up our own minds.
What I would really like to hear is EscapeCD declare
his/her real intention: This would be just trying to make a buck by ripping off the
listers and the band and avoid prosecution.I am curious if EscapeCD offers a similar
"service" to other lists or artists.
dking
I was curious about this, too, so I did some searching
out in Usenet to see if I could find the name EscapeCD. He's also selling similar items by
Prince and Terrence Trent D'Arby. But (in EscapeCD's defense) at least those items didn't
appear to pirate tracks that are currently in print. Seems that their intention is
pretty clear,
R.Moon
For starters, I respect both sides of the Escape CD
issue. But I would like to throw my 2 cents in:
Look, people, these are songs. Not plutonium. Nothing
earth shattering. Nothing magical is gonna happen if someone buys the bootlegs.
Having a CDR of these tracks does not give anyone super human powers that will enable them
to overthrow a government or anything. I really don't see the difference if someone
offers a cassette tape to me or a CDR, other than sound quality. So now, if you have a
great copy ... you can bootleg them yourself. Guess what, there are only so many Beautiful
South fans around. I think I'm the only fan of BS in a 200 mile radius as it is. None of
my friends are interested in them anyways (their loss)...who am I gonna copy the songs for
... my 67 year old mother who lives to go to Las Vegas every August?
I think what upsets people is the fact that some of us
could have owned a BMW if not for spending hard earned cash for the singles over the
past10 years. I have every single except "Song For Whoever" and I still
bought the "Beautiful B's". "You And Your Big Ideas" has been CDR-ed
for me months ago. I wanted the collection because it is convenient for me. My originals
are now safely tucked away and I can have 70+ minutes of continues Bside pleasure.
L.Gaylord
I feel like TBS (or their label) rips us off with
overpriced CDs and multiple CD singles each containing one or two non-album tracks. The
question I ask isn't "Is some of this money going back to the band?" but rather
"What are the motivations of the person who burned these tracks onto CD?"
If I'm convinced that the person who burned the tracks
to CD is a real TBS fan who wants to "share the wealth" by distributing
non-album tracks among other TBS fans, I have no problem giving them a reasonable amount
of money to cover costs and some small compensation for their time. But when someone like
"EscapeCD" asks $16 (plus shipping) per disk, it's obvious that he's in it to
make a buck. Under those circumstances, I see absolutely nothing wrong with buying the CDs
and duping them for other TBSfans at $1 or $2 per disc. After all, what is
"EscapeCD" going to do? Sue me? Buahahahaha!
R.Moon
I'm not being cavalier, I just think if the BS were
really interested, they would put out a free standing B side collection. I'll tell
you one thing, if I bonked Briana one night and in a fit of carnal rapture she gave me a
DAT of studio outakes, you can bet everyone's buttons you'd all what me to make copies.
RELAX FOLKS, IT AIN'T GONNA HAPPEN. I love my
originals, love the artwork, love how they look, smell (haven'ttasted any yet). To me, a
CDR is a home made thing. I paid Escape for his services, not the songs. I already had
99.9% ofthem. For those who bought it for the songs. They got lucky. I'd buy a legit
B-side collection they day it went up for sale!
P.Kelly
Here is my opinion of what is ripping off TBS and what
isn't:
1) Concert CDS - NO; these concerts were never taped
for distribution and the band would never profit from them.
2) Rare b-sides - NO; if the songs are only found on
out-of-production CD singles, then TBS stands nothing to lose. The only people losing
money would be the shop owners who sell used CDs.
3) Current Singles and any of the songs on the albums
still being produced - YES; as long as the record company is still burning the material,
it is taking money out of TBS's hands and into the hands of the bootlegger.
J.Carr
If i had an album that sold the same quantity that
COUTC has, i don't think I'd be too damn worried about my livelihood and the effects that
a few shiny discs offered to a small mailing list might have upon it... on the other hand
I do feel sorry for Terrence Trent D'arby and the no doubt fine members of his list whom
are being prayed upon ... for the love of god, the horse is dead.
Isn't there a mailing list devoted to 'bootlegs'? I
just heard a TBS thread is running rampant on it (somewhere) |